Main

November 6, 2006

This is your political process on drugs

So what happens when potheads get measures placed on the ballot?

Marijuana is safer than drinking sounds like an anti-alcohol campaign more than a pro-marijuana campaign. The serious flaw in this logic is that we don’t know what kind of damage would be done by people who are high in a society where marijuana is legal. Once you increase the number of people smoking marijuana, you will increase the marijuana-related accidents.

It also underscores how ridiculous our political process can become. Bush and Cheney are target against because of mistakes that they made. And yet democrats will defend Bill Clinton to the death for making his mistake in the oval office. If you are a politician (or an aspiring one) and you screw up in the least bit, you can be sure that people will exploit it to its fullest so that a tragic situation becomes a weapon for your opposition.

You have to stop and wonder how politicians can be so stupid as to screw up so badly and not think that someone will find out (see Foley, Mark and Haggard, Ted). But then you have to stop and wonder, what mud could be slung at me if reporters pried into every dark corner of my life?

June 13, 2006

It's time to take a stand

There’s a pornography store a few blocks from my house right accross the street from an elementary school. I’m pretty sure there is a law against this in Denver. At any rate, it just seems wrong and I don’t want that hell hole anywhere near my house. The city says they’re going to do something about it but it’s going to happen at the government’s pace which means that it will be delayed indefinitely.

Isn’t there something that citizens can do against something like this? Can’t we get our own Minute Men and block the doorway for a week? That would send a good message. I was thinking how much destructive grafitti there is in Denver and how great it would be to put spray paint to good use. I know it goes against the “rule of law” concept that keeps our society in good working order, but lately I’ve been feeling like I’m getting the short end of the night-stick.

Take Saturday night for example. My brother and I wanted to get out and go skateboarding so we went to the downtown skate park. The lights turned off at 11:00pm but there was still plenty of light so we kept skating. A cop snuck up with her lights off on her motorcycle. She caught us and gave us each “park violations” carrying a fine of $50. This was the very night that some punks kids were doing $70 worth of damage to my car back home. I’m all for keeping people out of parks at night but if it’s a question of resources, why not take the cops off of the park beat and put them in charge of protecting citizens of Denver?

In my neighborhood, a few bad apples spoil the barrel. We’ve had trouble with the same group of kids for the two years that I’ve lived there. They’ve terrorized people, broken windows, broken into houses, and kept us all up for countless hours during the night. I’ve probably called the cops over 30 times and each time the cops simply take them somewhere for a half an hour and then bring them back. They tell me that there’s nothing that they can do because there is not enough room in the juvenile detention center for these kids.

I have a few ideas that are really simple:
1) Put them in the adult jails
2) Build a new juvenile detention center (we just gave you several million dollars for a new jail - that outta help)
3) Put them in an alcoholic recovery center
4) Build a guantanamo-style detention center

I’m sure that there are perfectly good reasons why these four ideas won’t work but I’m starting to get really frustrated that the city can’t seem to be able to run the city.

They have to charge money for us to get to work on time, there isn’t enough space in the juvenile detention center to keep bad kids off the streets but by golly we better punish those law-abiding 29 year olds for being in the park at night. I really want to know where all that tax money is going that keeps getting snatched from my paycheck?

May 22, 2006

What are taxes for...

If not for roads? Republican or Democrat, can’t we all agree that taxes should at least pay for roads and schools? Then why are we going to have to start paying to use a lane on I-25? I’ll bet everyone is going to be really excited that there’s a way to get to work faster, now, but they don’t realize that they’re being robbed and the robber is giving a little bit back and that’s the only reason that they’re happy. The initial problem is that HOV or Carpool lanes are unethical. The government, who’s basic responsibility is to give us roads to drive on is asking us to pay for something we already pay for in taxes. Instead of building the roads we need, they try to tell us how they want us to get to work: “You have to drive with someone else to work”. Why doesn’t the government let us decide how we are going to drive to work. Now instead of making it right and getting rid of the HOV lane, they decide they want us to give them even MORE money. How much money does the government need? 30% of my paycheck goes to the government and then they want me to pay to get to work in a reasonable amount of time.

These types of laws are going to continue to be passed until Coloradans wake up and realize that we are being seriously wronged by our government. GET RID OF THE HOV LANE!

November 8, 2005

Abortion and Popcorn

I saw Senator Ken Salazar at the movies on Saturday night. At first I was thinking that it's kinda cool that he was just strolling around the movie theater. The more I thought about it, the more it seemed strange to me. What was he doing in Arvada? Why was he just walking by himself with his popcorn and his signature cowboy hat? Doesn't he have an entourage?

I guess that's the reason he beat out Pete Coors as the Colorado Senator. I'm sorry, but if we ever saw Pete Coors, he'd have a huge entourage and it would have cost me several hundred dollars to attend the function. Ken is just a regular guy. Of course, that doesn't make him any better of a politician. I considered voting for Salazar, though, even though Pete is with my party.

The Coors family goes and speaks at megachurches and talks about how to be Christian businessmen. If they know so much on the subject then how come advertisments for "The Silver Bullet" are the most degrading and sexually charged ads on television? "Well... er, um, we don't really run the marketing department... [blah blah blah]"

I was going to cast my vote for Ken as a protest vote and because I actually think he's a pretty good politician. I'm worried about his policy on abortion, though. He says he's catholic, but that seems to be a flexible term these days. I guess I should have asked him while I had the chance at the movie theater. He's got his popcorn, I've got mine, the movie is about to begin: "Hey, what's your stance on abortion?"

May 2, 2005

More PR Problems for Focus on the Family

Lately, I've been criticizing on Focus on the Family for getting involved in the judicial nomination food fight in Washington. Now they're getting some bad press again for having arrested a protester that was trying to hand-deliver a message to Dobson after leading 150 protesters to their offices in Colorado Springs. This could have been a great opportunity for Focus on the Family to show some sensitivity while standing their ground.

Continue reading "More PR Problems for Focus on the Family" »

MCI played Qwest big-time

I'm not sure how many of you have been following the bidding wars between Verizon and Qwest for MCI. It's a big story in Colorado since Qwest employs a good portion of the Denver metro area.

It was pretty clear from the beginning that Qwest never had a shot, but was being used by MCI to drive up the offer from Verizon. MCI brilliantly positioned themselves to gain somewhere in the neighborhood of $26 per share from Verizon -- well above what they're worth.