Main

August 1, 2006

Teach a Man to Fish

The term "social justice" is getting a lot of traction with Christian communities and organizations in the U.S. The idea carries an assumption that "justice" means equality of standard of living. It is the idea that it is unjust that Bill Gates has a giant mansion and there are people in the heart of the city that are having trouble feeding their families and paying their rent. To a social-justice proponent, this is not only unfair, but unjust.

This concept is based on the assumption that justice means equality of standard-of-living. This is certainly at-odds with our constitution and with the econmic foundations of our country. The constitution explicitly gaurantees "the pursuit of hapiness" as a right. Most constitutional scholars agree that this can be translated "the pursuit of wealth" for legal purposes. The phrase "the pursuit of" is the key difference between how I see justice and how social-justice proponents see justice.

There are two keys to gaining wealth in the U.S.: 1) Education (knowledge) and 2) Excessive Cash. When I write excessive cash, I don't mean to suggest that it has to be an exhorbitant amount, I just mean that you need cash above and beyond what you need to live. One of the reasons there is so much opportunity in this country is that it is relatively easy to borrow money and get the excessive cash you need in order to build a business, buy real estate, or for any other purpose. You can also buy a car or a boat or a television on borrowed money which is where the education comes in. Just as there is an abudance of opportunity to gain wealth in the U.S. there is also and abundance of opportunity to lose it. There are many opportunities which allow you to live like a rich person without actually being rich. I have neighbors who can barely pay their rent and they are driving brand new Cadillac Escalades while I own my house and several others and drive a 24 year old Toyota with over 200K miles. The difference here is the second key to wealth building: Education.

Many Christians will have closed the browser window by now because wealth is considered evil. Wealth implies an over-abundance or a hoarding to many Christians. I call it good stewardship. That is because on the same income, with some better financial practices, the same person can vastly improve their financial situation. That is more than justice, that is freedom.

Most organizations that work with the poor, do not emphasize financial education (or any other type of education). It seems to me that social justice organizations are trying to change laws in order to force the middle class and wealthy to take pay the rent and bills of the poor. Don't get me wrong, I don't want anyone to go hungry. But wouldn't it be better for us to be teaching the poor how to escape their poverty? Shouldn't minority leaders be crying "Education!" instead of crying "Injustice!"?

Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

My whole argument assumes that we're talking about the U.S. - where we have the greatest financial opportunities mankind has ever seen. What do we do for the poor in countries where they do not have opportunity like we have here? In some cases, they can also be brought education and infrastructure that allows them to improve their situation. In other cases, however, their government or economic structures simply don't allow them to better their situation. I don't know the answer to this question.

Blogged with Flock

July 28, 2006

If they want to "observe", let them buy a televesion set

U.N. observers leave Israel-Lebanon border - Yahoo! News

The United Nations is living in some kind of dream world where "Peacekeepers" and "Obeservers" can keep the world safe. I hate to make light of the situation, because it's really tragic to send people in the middle of a battlefield to "observe" and let them get killed for no reason.

The only power that the United Nations has is the power of disapproval. Many countries think that this is true power because the worst thing they can think of is another country disapproving of its actions. Hezbolla, however, doesn't care what anyone think of its actions except for the Jews whom they are keeping in a state of daily panic. Israel doesn't care what anyone thinks because it's tired of being bullied especially when it has the strongest firepower in the region.

We've been having "talks" about and with the middle east for 40 years and how has that helped the region? Which conflict has been solved because of "observers" and "peacekeepers"? It's time for the world to wake up to the reality that there are all kinds of people who don't care what anyone else thinks.


technorati tags:, ,

Blogged with Flock

January 12, 2006

Goofy Dictators

Why do dictators always look so goofy? Maybe there’s some connection between megalomania and goofiness? I’ve been thinking of trying to collect all the funny photos of dictators but I probably shouldn’t make light of the worlds worst tyrants. King Gyanendra of Nepal is one of my favorites. I’ve never seen a picture of him without his sunglasses. He even wears them inside. It must be handy having a third arm, though, for carrying extra pieces of paper… and hawaiian leis.

Hundreds Killed in Hajj Stampede

This is one of those stories that Americans have a difficult time understanding. It’s like when we read about crazed fans getting trampled at soccer (football for the Europhiles) games, we wonder how in the world people can be so clueless as to press on when they’re walking on other people. Even when I was down in the mosh pits at a rock concert in high school, we’d help a guy up just before we started slamming into them again. What a senseless way to die. I hope that Saudi Arabia can figure out some order to the rituals next year. I doubt anything will change considering this is the eighth time a major disaster has occured at these rituals.

January 6, 2006

Spinning the Congo Conflict

“The World” on Public Radio International featured Dr. Richard J Brennan discussing his latest research on mortality rates attributed to the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The host, Lisa Mullins, opens the segment by calling the conflict in the Congo the deadliest war since WWII claiming (based on Brennan’s research) that almost 4,000,000 have died as a result of the conflict. Mullins stated that the number killed is over twice the number of deaths from the Asia Tsunami every few months.

“Those death rates are staggering!” I thought to myslef, “Even in the American media, you’d think numbers like that would merit more attention from main stream media.” I decided to do some more research. Here’s what I found in the Brennan’s analysis originally published in The Lancet (registration required):

Total death toll from the conflict (1998–2004) was estimated to be 3·9 million. Mortality rate was higher in unstable eastern provinces, showing the effect of insecurity. Most deaths were from easily preventable and treatable illnesses rather than violence. Regression analysis suggested that if the effects of violence were removed, all-cause mortality could fall to almost normal rates.

So it turns out that these 3.9 million did not die as a result of military action (as was suggested in the piece on PRI) but only 1.5% of them died as a direct result of the conflict. The rest died from diseases or starvation or other causes. My heart breaks for the Congolese that are dying as a result of poverty and substandard living conditions.

Continue reading "Spinning the Congo Conflict" »

October 19, 2005

WWJD in American Politics

I was reading Lileks' ScreedBlog this morning (a must read, BTW) and he recounted a scene of some protesters in a Minneapolis suburb:

One of the signs, of course, said “Who Would Jesus Bomb.” Never heard that before. Hmm. Well. I think the proper question is “On Whom Would Jesus Levy Porous Sanctions Undermined by Corrupt International Officials Who turned Oil-For-Food Into a Massive Payola Operation for the International Nomenklatura,” but that wouldn’t fit on a sign.

It made me think of how often people attempt to bring Jesus into american politics. Applying WWJD to American Politics is a tough task because Jesus stayed away from politics. Jesus was not a Democrat - nor was he a Republican.

Continue reading "WWJD in American Politics" »

October 12, 2005

Pallywood

I don't subscribe to the "media bias" conspiracy theory but that doesn't mean that I trust the media. Seeing this video strengthens my theory that the media is more incompetent and gullible than it is biased.

June 8, 2005

Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan

Read this article on A strange and scary custom in Kyrgystan.

April 20, 2005

The Pope is Catholic!

I've been meaning to write, for some time now, on the ridiculous behavior of non-catholics commenting on the selection of the pope. I was held back by the idea that these New York Times reporters might be nominal Catholics and I'd have to do a lot of research before making a general complaint. For a nice summary of my sentiments (much better written than I could have done) check out Lileks today.

Continue reading "The Pope is Catholic!" »

April 15, 2005

Orphans in Nepal

I've received some profiles from the new children that the orphanage that I visited in Nepal has brought in. It breaks my heart to read these children's stories. Having seen the wonderful care that they will receive, I am also joyful that they've been given such a wonderful blessing.

Continue reading "Orphans in Nepal" »

March 28, 2005

UN to send Peacekeepers to Darfur

Read the story here.

How many Sudanese died while the U.S. and other nations were deliberating about the International Criminal Court?

Just as I was typing the title to this entry, I realized that the word "peacekeeper" has a different meaning to euro-types than it does to Americans. At the UN, "peacekeepers" are unarmed soldiers with powder-blue helmets. In the US, "peacekeepers" are 200,000 pound intercontinental ballistic missiles. While I'm not comfortable with the "peace-by-force" concept, you have to look at which philosophy has brought more lasting peace. [hint: Regan's. success in the Cold War vs. the UN's success in Rwanda]

March 25, 2005

Kyrgyz opposition takes control

The people of Kyrgyzstan have ousted their government after an election that was widely seen as fraudulent. You can read the story here.

I spent six weeks in the neighboring country of Uzbekistan. I also had friends who spent the same amount of time in Kyrgyzstan. After the collapse of the soviet union, both of these governments became mildly stable but incredibly corrupt. I found the economic system of the country to be basically a barter system of bribes. You bribe the police, your teachers, judges, any public servant. That's how they get paid. It doesn't suprise me that the people are sick and tired of it. People all over the world are beginning to stand up for positive change and freedom.

March 15, 2005

Nepalis want freedom

Nepal's king is obviously not paying attention to world events right now. He's detained over 750 protesters nationwide since dissolving the democratic government on February 1. Given the rampant corruption in the government and their disobedience to an election deadline, his actions are defensible, but people want to be free. If you try to shut them down, you only embolden them. I fear for the state of Nepal in the next few years. Watch for even more protests in the coming months.

June 19, 2003

Iran Protesters

Read this insightful and chilling report of Iranian protesters at a great blog for inside information into the Iran freedom movement: Notes of an Iranian girl